Who Runs It

Progress Housing Group: how does this landlord perform?

Progress Housing Group owns 11,081 social homes in 166 English local authority areas (31 March 2026), most of them in South Ribble (3,768). In 2024/25, 76.3% of its tenants were satisfied with the overall service (England median 71.8%), up from 75.2% in 2023/24; 0.1% of homes did not meet the Decent Homes Standard; 84.0% of routine repairs were done within its target. The regulator has not yet given it a consumer grade. Source: Regulator of Social Housing.

Data: housing association homes 31 March 2026, council homes 31 March 2025, Tenant Satisfaction Measures 2024/25, regulator grades 28 October 2026 · calculated 7 November 2026 · Methodology and sources

76.3%tenants satisfied overall, 2024/25
11,032homes covered by its TSM (year end 2024/25)
not gradedconsumer grade
166local authority areas

Tenant Satisfaction Measures: 2023/24 and 2024/25

Measure2024/252023/24England median 2024/25
Satisfied with the overall service (TP01)76.3%75.2%71.8%
Satisfied with repairs (TP02)80.5%74.3%73.6%
Satisfied with time taken for the last repair (TP03)72.8%67.4%69.5%
Home is well maintained (TP04)77.7%72.5%71.9%
Home is safe (TP05)80.5%78.3%77.6%
Landlord listens and acts (TP06)63.7%63.2%61.6%
Satisfied with complaints handling (TP09)45.8%43.2%35.5%
Satisfied with anti-social behaviour handling (TP12)60.6%62.4%59.5%
Homes not meeting the Decent Homes Standard (RP01)0.1%0.2%0.5%
Non-emergency repairs within target (RP02)84.0%82.3%82.5%
Emergency repairs within target (RP02)94.8%89.9%94.9%
Stage one complaints per 1,000 homes (CH01)71.287.753.9
Stage one complaints answered in time (CH02)99.6%92.8%89.9%
Gas safety checks done (BS01)100.0%100.0%100.0%
Fire risk assessments done (BS02)98.4%99.8%100.0%
Anti-social behaviour cases per 1,000 homes (NM01)52.956.036.0

Satisfaction measures come from the landlord's own tenant survey (1,420 responses in 2024/25); management measures from its own records. Median across the 353 landlords that reported. The landlord's own TSM publication: https://corporate.progressgroup.org.uk/policies-and-repor....

Regulator's grades

Consumer standards (C1–C4)not graded yet
Governance (G1–G4)G1, 26 November 2025
Financial viability (V1–V4)V1, 26 November 2025
Latest engagementStability Check (26 November 2025)

Other landlords covered by the same judgement: Progress Housing Association Limited, Reside Housing Association Limited.

C1 = the landlord meets the consumer standards; C2 = some weaknesses; C3 = serious failings; C4 = very serious failings. Governance and viability apply to housing associations only. An asterisk (C1*) marks a grade given in an inspection within a group. Source: regulatory judgements table, 28 October 2026.

Where it owns homes

AreaHomesShare of the area's social homesFailing Decent Homes
South Ribble3,76861%21
Fylde2,13456%7
Leeds4571%0
Chorley4055%0
Wyre3076%1
Preston2872%0
West Lancashire1502%0
Hyndburn1423%0
County Durham1290%0
Doncaster1280%0
Liverpool1150%0
Bassetlaw1041%0
North Yorkshire1030%0
Blackpool971%0
Salford890%0
151 more areas
Lancaster821%0
Blackburn with Darwen751%0
Mansfield741%0
Wirral740%0
Newark and Sherwood691%0
Wigan620%0
Rochdale580%0
Westmorland and Furness510%0
Ribble Valley502%0
Reigate and Banstead451%0
Sutton440%0
North East Lincolnshire420%0
Leicester420%0
King's Lynn and West Norfolk420%0
North Kesteven401%0
Fareham381%0
Sheffield380%0
Nottingham370%0
South Holland371%0
North Lincolnshire350%0
Isle of Wight340%0
Huntingdonshire340%0
South Kesteven340%0
Trafford330%0
Broxtowe300%0
Halton290%0
Torbay290%0
Boston280%0
Norwich280%0
Kingston upon Thames280%0
York270%0
Cheshire West and Chester270%0
St. Helens270%0
North Tyneside270%0
Ashfield260%0
Sefton260%0
East Lindsey250%0
Broadland250%0
Gedling250%0
Shropshire230%0
Ipswich230%0
Bradford230%0
Teignbridge220%0
Pendle220%0
Great Yarmouth220%0
Darlington210%3
Buckinghamshire210%0
North Norfolk210%0
Medway200%0
Swale200%0
Lincoln200%0
South Norfolk200%0
Stockport200%0
Colchester190%0
Elmbridge190%0
Knowsley190%0
Sunderland190%0
Exeter180%0
Oadby and Wigston181%0
Tandridge180%0
Rotherham180%0
Rushcliffe170%0
Bromley170%0
Waltham Forest170%0
Brighton and Hove160%0
Greenwich160%0
Surrey Heath150%0
East Riding of Yorkshire140%0
East Devon140%0
Gosport140%0
Bolton140%0
Haringey140%0
Amber Valley130%0
Burnley130%0
Charnwood130%0
West Suffolk130%0
Dorset120%0
West Lindsey120%0
Tonbridge and Malling110%0
Hinckley and Bosworth110%0
Tameside110%0
Richmond upon Thames110%0
Watford100%0
Bexley100%0
Cheshire East90%0
Northumberland90%0
Cumberland90%0
Fenland90%0
Uttlesford90%0
Dover90%0
Maidstone90%0
Stevenage90%0
Newcastle upon Tyne90%0
Middlesbrough80%0
Rutland80%0
Central Bedfordshire80%0
Bolsover80%0
Chesterfield80%0
Braintree80%0
Folkestone and Hythe80%0
West Oxfordshire80%0
Lewisham80%0
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole70%0
Eastleigh70%0
Blaby70%0
Bury70%0
Birmingham70%0
Barnsley70%0
Slough60%0
East Cambridgeshire60%0
Rushmoor60%0
Dartford60%0
Breckland60%0
Babergh60%0
Brent60%0
Havant50%0
Mole Valley50%0
Wyre Forest50%0
Croydon50%0
Telford and Wrekin40%0
North East Derbyshire40%0
South Hams40%0
East Hampshire40%0
Dacorum40%0
Melton40%0
North West Leicestershire40%0
West Northamptonshire30%0
Somerset30%0
Mid Devon30%0
North Devon30%0
Maldon30%0
Tendring30%0
New Forest30%0
Mid Suffolk30%0
Worcester30%0
St Albans30%0
Rossendale20%0
Nuneaton and Bedworth20%0
East Suffolk20%0
Manchester20%0
Barnet20%0
Redcar and Cleveland10%0
Kingston upon Hull10%0
Peterborough10%0
Milton Keynes10%0
Southampton10%0
Hertsmere10%0
Ashford10%0
Thanet10%0
Bromsgrove10%0
Gateshead10%0

Housing association homes by local authority, 31 March 2026 (Statistical Data Return).

Tenant Satisfaction Measures (TSM) are reported by each landlord for its whole stock (or its group), not for one area; survey methods differ and the regulator warns against direct comparison. Figures are for 2024/25, the latest published when this site was built.