Who owns the social housing in Buckinghamshire?
Buckinghamshire has 33,608 social homes owned by 58 landlords: the council owns 163 (31 March 2025) and housing associations and other registered providers 33,445 (31 March 2026). The largest is Paradigm Housing Group with 10,119 (30%). Among the bigger landlords here, the share of tenants satisfied with the overall service in 2024/25 (each landlord's whole stock, not only Buckinghamshire) ranges from 58.7% (Peabody Trust) to 84.1% (Bromford Flagship). England median: 71.8%. Source: Regulator of Social Housing, Tenant Satisfaction Measures 2024/25.
Landlords in Buckinghamshire
| Landlord | Homes here | Failing Decent Homes here* | Satisfied overall (TP01) | Not decent, whole stock (RP01) | Repairs on time (RP02) | Complaints per 1,000 (CH01) | Consumer grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paradigm Housing Group | 10,119 (30%) | 94 | 82.0% | 0.7% | 86.8% | 55.2 | not graded |
| Fairhive Homes | 8,629 (26%) | 0 | 82.9% | 0.0% | 80.1% | 72.2 | not graded |
| Red Kite Community Housing | 5,326 (16%) | 20 | 75.4% | 0.0% | 81.2% | 49.0 | not graded |
| Hightown Housing Association | 1,545 (5%) | 3 | 68.3% | 0.0% | 93.7% | 42.4 | not graded |
| Peabody Trust | 1,217 (4%) | 0 | 58.7% | 0.1% | 73.5% | 65.7 | C2 |
| Metropolitan Housing Trust | 1,032 (3%) | 15 | 67.7% | 2.9% | 83.4% | 115.7 | C2 |
| Housing Solutions | 821 (2%) | 0 | 84.0% | 0.0% | 65.5% | 37.6 | C1 |
| The Guinness Partnership | 697 (2%) | 0 | 67.7% | 0.2% | 78.3% | 56.1 | C1 |
| Thrive Homes | 661 (2%) | 0 | 74.8% | 0.1% | 73.1% | 134.0 | not graded |
| Bromford Flagship | 408 (1%) | 0 | 84.1% | 0.0% | 70.2% | 70.7 | not graded |
| Home Group | 357 (1%) | 3 | 68.2% | 0.1% | 75.3% | 68.4 | C2 |
| Hastoe Housing Association | 309 (1%) | 1 | 63.9% | 0.4% | 80.3% | 46.9 | C2 |
| Anchor Hanover Group | 271 (1%) | 3 | 86.1% | 0.0% | 78.5% | 46.0 | C3 |
| Buckinghamshire Council council | 163 (0%) | — | — | — | — | — | not graded |
| Sanctuary Housing Association | 159 (0%) | 0 | 63.9% | 0.2% | 69.6% | 114.0 | C1 |
30 more landlords
| Abri Group | 158 (0%) | 0 | 74.5% | 0.0% | 94.7% | 69.9 | C2 |
| YMCA Chiltern Group | 141 (0%) | 0 | — | — | — | — | not graded |
| Sage Homes RP | 137 (0%) | 0 | 86.2% | 0.0% | 75.7% | 21.5 | not graded |
| Sage Rented | 118 (0%) | 0 | 66.7% | 0.0% | 67.9% | 26.7 | not graded |
| Heylo Housing Registered Provider | 106 (0%) | 0 | — | — | — | — | not graded |
| Places for People Group | 99 (0%) | 5 | 64.3% | 0.1% | 47.1% | 29.2 | C1 |
| Sovereign Network Group | 95 (0%) | 0 | 63.1% | 2.1% | 68.6% | 97.2 | C2 |
| The Riverside Group | 84 (0%) | 2 | 66.6% | 0.5% | 76.1% | 88.6 | not graded |
| bpha | 84 (0%) | 0 | 71.8% | 0.0% | 66.6% | 38.5 | C1 |
| Clarion Housing Group | 82 (0%) | 0 | 63.7% | 0.6% | 76.3% | 52.7 | C2 |
| Notting Hill Genesis | 72 (0%) | 0 | 53.8% | 0.4% | 73.2% | 108.3 | C3 |
| Amplius Living | 70 (0%) | 0 | 61.8% | 1.4% | 67.4% | 114.4 | C2 |
| Housing 21 | 67 (0%) | 0 | 89.8% | 0.0% | 97.3% | 12.9 | C1 |
| The ExtraCare Charitable Trust | 64 (0%) | 0 | — | — | — | — | not graded |
| Golden Lane Housing | 53 (0%) | 0 | 78.8% | 0.0% | 96.5% | 40.5 | C1 |
| Advance Housing and Support | 46 (0%) | 0 | 80.5% | 0.1% | 93.2% | 59.0 | C2 |
| Soha Housing | 41 (0%) | 0 | 80.5% | 0.0% | 86.7% | 98.6 | not graded |
| YMCA North Tyneside | 40 (0%) | 0 | — | — | — | — | not graded |
| English Rural Housing Association | 37 (0%) | 0 | 77.0% | 0.0% | 82.1% | 11.2 | C2 |
| Masonic Housing Association | 33 (0%) | 0 | — | — | — | — | not graded |
| Sparrow Shared Ownership | 32 (0%) | 0 | — | — | — | — | C1* |
| MTD Housing | 31 (0%) | 0 | — | — | — | — | not graded |
| Holtspur Housing Association | 29 (0%) | 0 | — | — | — | — | not graded |
| Paragon Asra Housing | 24 (0%) | 0 | 64.8% | 0.0% | 84.1% | 97.4 | C1 |
| Thame and District Housing Association | 24 (0%) | 0 | — | — | — | — | not graded |
| Progress Housing Group | 21 (0%) | 0 | 76.3% | 0.1% | 84.0% | 71.2 | not graded |
| Greenhill Housing Association | 15 (0%) | 0 | — | — | — | — | not graded |
| Bespoke Supportive Tenancies | 13 (0%) | 0 | 67.9% | 5.8% | 83.0% | 67.3 | not graded |
| Rosewood Housing | 12 (0%) | 0 | — | — | — | — | not graded |
| The Abbeyfield Chalfonts Society | 11 (0%) | 0 | — | — | — | — | not graded |
* Housing associations only, homes in Buckinghamshire (31 March 2026); councils report Decent Homes for their whole stock (RP01). Other columns cover each landlord's whole stock (TSM 2024/25). England medians: satisfied 71.8%, not decent 0.5%, repairs on time 82.5%, complaints 53.9 per 1,000. “—” means the landlord did not report this measure (landlords with fewer than 1,000 homes do not have to).
13 smaller landlords with fewer than 10 homes here (55 homes)
A2Dominion Housing Group, Dimensions (UK), Salvation Army Housing Association, Trinity Housing Association, Ability Housing Association, Moat Homes, Life 2009, Orbit Group, London & Quadrant Housing Trust, Inclusion Housing Community Interest Company, GreenSquareAccord, Southern Housing, Stonewater
What the grades mean
The Regulator of Social Housing grades landlords on consumer standards (safety, repairs, complaints, tenant voice) from C1 (best) to C4 (serious failings). Grading started in April 2024, so many landlords have not been graded yet. 98% of the social homes in Buckinghamshire belong to a landlord that reported Tenant Satisfaction Measures for 2024/25.
Tenant Satisfaction Measures (TSM) are reported by each landlord for its whole stock (or its group), not for one area; survey methods differ and the regulator warns against direct comparison. Figures are for 2024/25, the latest published when this site was built.
Housing association homes are counted on 31 March 2026 (Statistical Data Return), council homes on 31 March 2025 (Live Table 116); the totals mix the two dates. Other areas in South East.