Who Runs It

Notting Hill Genesis: how does this landlord perform?

Notting Hill Genesis owns 48,310 social homes in 74 English local authority areas (31 March 2026), most of them in Hammersmith and Fulham (5,017). In 2024/25, 53.8% of its tenants were satisfied with the overall service (England median 71.8%), down from 55.6% in 2023/24; 0.4% of homes did not meet the Decent Homes Standard; 73.2% of routine repairs were done within its target. Regulator's consumer grade: C3 (27 November 2024). Source: Regulator of Social Housing.

Data: housing association homes 31 March 2026, council homes 31 March 2025, Tenant Satisfaction Measures 2024/25, regulator grades 28 October 2026 · calculated 7 November 2026 · Methodology and sources

53.8%tenants satisfied overall, 2024/25
49,705homes covered by its TSM (year end 2024/25)
C3consumer grade
74local authority areas

Tenant Satisfaction Measures: 2023/24 and 2024/25

Measure2024/252023/24England median 2024/25
Satisfied with the overall service (TP01)53.8%55.6%71.8%
Satisfied with repairs (TP02)57.5%61.3%73.6%
Satisfied with time taken for the last repair (TP03)55.3%59.3%69.5%
Home is well maintained (TP04)58.6%59.1%71.9%
Home is safe (TP05)65.5%67.7%77.6%
Landlord listens and acts (TP06)49.1%49.9%61.6%
Satisfied with complaints handling (TP09)27.8%29.5%35.5%
Satisfied with anti-social behaviour handling (TP12)56.0%56.2%59.5%
Homes not meeting the Decent Homes Standard (RP01)0.4%0.5%0.5%
Non-emergency repairs within target (RP02)73.2%78.6%82.5%
Emergency repairs within target (RP02)87.6%92.8%94.9%
Stage one complaints per 1,000 homes (CH01)108.357.553.9
Stage one complaints answered in time (CH02)59.4%70.8%89.9%
Gas safety checks done (BS01)99.7%93.8%100.0%
Fire risk assessments done (BS02)98.7%92.3%100.0%
Anti-social behaviour cases per 1,000 homes (NM01)18.919.136.0

Satisfaction measures come from the landlord's own tenant survey (2,614 responses in 2024/25); management measures from its own records. Median across the 353 landlords that reported. The landlord's own TSM publication: https://www.nhg.org.uk/your-community/how-we-are-performi....

Regulator's grades

Consumer standards (C1–C4)C3, 27 November 2024
Governance (G1–G4)G3, 27 November 2024
Financial viability (V1–V4)V2, 28 October 2026
Latest engagementStability Check and Responsive Engagement (28 October 2026)

Other landlords covered by the same judgement: Notting Hill Home Ownership Limited, Springboard Two Housing Association Limited.

C1 = the landlord meets the consumer standards; C2 = some weaknesses; C3 = serious failings; C4 = very serious failings. Governance and viability apply to housing associations only. An asterisk (C1*) marks a grade given in an inspection within a group. Source: regulatory judgements table, 28 October 2026.

Where it owns homes

AreaHomesShare of the area's social homesFailing Decent Homes
Hammersmith and Fulham5,01718%29
Brent4,18913%12
Kensington and Chelsea3,96819%47
Westminster3,14711%13
Barnet3,13714%1
Lambeth2,8296%4
Newham2,6947%0
Ealing2,5369%9
Tower Hamlets2,3825%1
Hounslow1,8567%6
Camden1,8245%4
Hackney1,4793%1
Southwark1,4352%2
Enfield8914%0
Hillingdon8044%1
59 more areas

Housing association homes by local authority, 31 March 2026 (Statistical Data Return).

Registered providers in this group

The regulator's group look-up tool places these registered providers in this group; the group reports Tenant Satisfaction Measures for all of them.

Tenant Satisfaction Measures (TSM) are reported by each landlord for its whole stock (or its group), not for one area; survey methods differ and the regulator warns against direct comparison. Figures are for 2024/25, the latest published when this site was built.